🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive a decisive continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Clash Over Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Authority Behind Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “will be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss them for playing excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later bin them for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.